Change in approach to proxy voting from individual managers to a third-party proxy provider.
CFS committed to net zero emissions by 2050.
Became members of Climate action 100+
Appointed a third-party proxy adviser to engage with companies on behalf of CFS.
Lodged first Modern Slavery Statement (as part of Commonwealth Bank)
Assessment report from Principles for Responsible Investment
Report to Principles for Responsible Investment
Fully divested from tobacco producers and controversial weapons manufacturers
Report to Principles of Responsible Investment
Commitment to divest tobacco and controversial weapons producers
Investment manager and customer surveys
Responsible Investment Framework
In our Responsible Investment Policy, we have committed to listening carefully to all sides of the conversation to deepen our understanding, and central to this is listening to our members.
We wanted to gauge our members' understanding of responsible investment – what the term means, what issues are of most concern and whether or not there has been a change over the years. To do so, we conducted another member survey in 2020 to follow up on a previous survey in 2017.
Unsurprisingly, there continues to be a number of different opinions about responsible investing. While the majority (75%) of survey respondents associated responsible investing with ethical, environmental or socially positive behaviours, almost 1 in 4 people either believed 'good' companies would be taking care of this anyway or weren't interested beyond the return of their investment.
want no fossil fuels
want no tobacco producers
want no gambling
want no landmines or nuclear weapons
want no native logging and deforestation
Illustrating the diversity of our members, just over 1 in 5 respondents saw the exclusion of certain industries as a top concern, while the same number claimed it was of little or no concern to them.
Just as there is no 'typical' member there is also a simplicity in these statements that needs further investigation. For instance, while 61% of respondents want no fossil fuels and over half want a shift to renewables, only 40% want carbon-neutral portfolios.
While we understand that members have their own personal moral or ethical views, we believe that in the long run, strong potential performance can be found where good investment management of ESG and climate risks are taken into consideration by companies which, as a result, will also improve long-term returns for members.
Note: Data refers to 2020 questionnaire that surveyed the views of our members.
In 2017, we asked our investment managers questions regarding their consideration of ESG factors in conjunction with the range of other risks and opportunities that may affect long-term investment outcomes. To stay across evolving issues within responsible investing and to recognise the evolving views of our managers, we recently revisited and updated this survey. This is helpful because it informs our view when researching and selecting investment strategies, appointing investment managers for our funds, as well as undertaking portfolio construction and allocating assets.
The results of the survey showed an increase in the number of our investment managers who said they were incorporating or considering ESG factors in some way – from 90% in 2017 to 97% in 2020. However, as in 2017, there was still a divergence in responses between global and local managers, and between smaller boutique managers and larger institutional managers. It may come as no surprise that larger managers are leading the integration of responsible investing practices, mainly due to their resourcing and influence.
One of the key takeaways from the survey was the large change in the consideration of climate change risk. In 2017, less than half of the investment managers surveyed said they considered climate change to be a risk to their investments, with only 18% measuring the carbon footprint of our portfolios. This has changed dramatically. Now, 96% of managers say they believe climate change is an investment risk, with more than half measuring the carbon footprint of our portfolios.
Note: Data refers to 2020 questionnaire that surveyed the views of our investment managers.
response rate (74 out of 76 managers)
integrate ESG into their investment process
are measuring carbon footprint of portfolios
believe climate change is an investment risk
Plan, compare and monitor your investments with our new tool.
Knowing your risk tolerance can help you make more informed investment decisions. Find out your risk profile.
We recommend speaking to an adviser to help you identify and achieve your financial goals.
Get in touch with us online or call us
8:30am to 6pm AEST Monday to Friday.
Use our tool to find professional financial advice,
local to you.
Track your balance and see your
transactions history from anywhere.
Information on this webpage is provided by Avanteos Investments Limited ABN 20 096 259 979, AFSL 245531 (AIL) and Colonial First State Investments Limited ABN 98 002 348 352, AFSL 232468 (CFSIL). It may include general advice but does not consider your individual objectives, financial situation, needs or tax circumstances. You can find the Target Market Determinations (TMD) for our financial products at www.cfs.com.au/tmd, which include a description of who a financial product might suit. You should read the Financial Services Guide (FSG) available online for information about our services. This information is based on current requirements and laws as at the date of publication.